Close Menu
  • Home
  • Courts
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Justice
    • Federal Courts
  • Crime
    • Fighting Racism
  • Justice Scales
  • Law
  • Unjust Legal Actions

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Who holds the power to declare war, the president or Congress? : NPR

June 23, 2025

US Border Patrol is increasingly seen far from the border

June 23, 2025

Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators

June 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Registration
    • Login
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Justice & Equality for allJustice & Equality for all
  • Home
  • Courts
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Justice
    • Federal Courts
  • Crime
    • Fighting Racism
  • Justice Scales
  • Law
  • Unjust Legal Actions
Justice & Equality for allJustice & Equality for all
Home » DOJ’s New Biglaw ‘Conflict’ Policy: A Masterclass in Retaliation Theater
Law

DOJ’s New Biglaw ‘Conflict’ Policy: A Masterclass in Retaliation Theater

adminBy adminMay 15, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Pinterest Email


In an effort to keep piling indignity upon the legacy of the Department of Justice, Deputy Attorney General (and apparently Librarian of Congress somehow?) Todd Blanche just unveiled a policy redefining “conflict of interest” to mean “dared to sue us” — directing that the Justice Department’s “private counsel” program can no longer hire any firm that “contemporaneously are directly adverse to the United States — for example, active litigation against Administration policies or representing clients in active litigation against Administration policies.”

The edict cites the Model Rules, which do identify as a conflict, “the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client.” Though since representing a law firm challenging an executive order has no substantive connection to helping the civil division collect debts — the point of the private counsel program — the announcement stretches the interpretation of “conflict” like flubber.

Since this isn’t really about ethics but empty symbolic retribution, it totally tracks.

There are around 20 Am Law 200 firms currently tussling with the government by the National Law Journal’s reckoning. That includes firms targeted by Trump executive orders that had the self-respect not to surrender, the firms representing those firms, as well as the firms representing the wrongfully deported or Harvard or people illegally fired by a ketamine-fueled idiot with a dubious special appointment.

Any firm already litigating against the administration had to expect this. The White House isn’t subtle about rule by vendetta. But it’s not so much deterring the current crop of firms opposing Trump. Draping itself in the legitimacy of the same ABA it’s relentlessly trashing, the DOJ announcement aspires to chill any future firm from taking a case against the administration by threatening to lock them out like a college grad at a Matt Gaetz party.

Except… who cares? The flipside of running an administration built on illegal retaliation is that it creates enough potential business to more than offset losing out on any private counsel work the DOJ might throw that way. When Trump closes a door, he opens several more and they all lead into courtrooms.

Does anyone actually think we’ve seen the end of law firms slapped with vindictive executive orders or universities receiving funding threats? There’s going to be work everywhere. This is like the living embodiment of the Jeremy Clarkson meme:

The only practical effect of this decision is leaving the DOJ without anyone trying to take on private counsel business. Maybe they can use some of that billion dollars worth of pro bono payola they’ve racked up.

Oh, sorry, that cowardly crop of Biglaw firms didn’t really agree to do work for the administration. Wink wink!

HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter or Bluesky if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators

June 23, 2025

It’s A Really Weird Time To Have One Of The Most Prestigious Public Interest Jobs In The Legal Industry

June 23, 2025

Biglaw Firm Fighting Trump Announces Staff Layoffs

June 23, 2025

Vault’s Top Law Firms By Practice Area And Region (2026)

June 23, 2025

Building A Successful CLE: Structuring Content With Value, Ethics, And Humor

June 20, 2025

Why Your Law Practice Is Killing You And How To Fix It

June 20, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

Who holds the power to declare war, the president or Congress? : NPR

By adminJune 23, 2025

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine discusses the mission…

Supreme Court puts on hold for now ruling pausing third-country deportations : NPR

June 23, 2025

Abrego Garcia can be released but ICE may be waiting in the wings : NPR

June 23, 2025

Ten Commandments in Louisiana classrooms blocked by court : NPR

June 21, 2025
Our Picks

Who holds the power to declare war, the president or Congress? : NPR

June 23, 2025

US Border Patrol is increasingly seen far from the border

June 23, 2025

Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators

June 23, 2025

Supreme Court puts on hold for now ruling pausing third-country deportations : NPR

June 23, 2025
About Us
About Us

Welcome to Justice and Equality for All, your trusted source for information on federal courts, legal systems, and issues of justice and discrimination. We are dedicated to providing insightful analysis, legal resources, and discussions on unjust legal actions, court rulings, and the scales of justice.

Our Picks

Who holds the power to declare war, the president or Congress? : NPR

June 23, 2025

US Border Patrol is increasingly seen far from the border

June 23, 2025

Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators

June 23, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Registration
    • Login
© 2025 justiceandequalityforall. Designed by justiceandequalityforall.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.