Close Menu
  • Home
  • Courts
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Justice
    • Federal Courts
  • Crime
    • Fighting Racism
  • Justice Scales
  • Law
  • Unjust Legal Actions

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Diamondbacks star Ketel Marte has home burglarized during All-Star break

July 17, 2025

South Korea’s top court upholds Lee’s acquittal in Samsung merger

July 17, 2025

Controversy Over Judge’s Secret Romance Heads To Trial

July 16, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Registration
    • Login
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Justice & Equality for allJustice & Equality for all
  • Home
  • Courts
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Justice
    • Federal Courts
  • Crime
    • Fighting Racism
  • Justice Scales
  • Law
  • Unjust Legal Actions
Justice & Equality for allJustice & Equality for all
Home » Supreme Court meets Friday to decide birthright citizenship and other cases
Federal Courts

Supreme Court meets Friday to decide birthright citizenship and other cases

adminBy adminJune 27, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Pinterest Email


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump’s bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally.

The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on Oct. 6.

The birthright citizenship order has been blocked nationwide by three lower courts. The Trump administration made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S.

The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years.

These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump’s efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies.

Decisions also are expected in several other important cases.

The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools.

Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district’s diversity.

The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county’s schools.

The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court.

Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana’s six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024.

Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time.

The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life.

At arguments in March, several of the court’s conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act.

Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography.

Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous.

The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn’t be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

South Korea’s top court upholds Lee’s acquittal in Samsung merger

July 17, 2025

Lawsuit seeks to stop ICE agents from arresting migrants at immigration courts

July 16, 2025

Court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory

July 16, 2025

Eligibility of Wisconsin’s Nyzier Fourqurean in question after appeals court reverses injunction

July 16, 2025

Pac-12, Mountain West headed back to court after mediation fails over millions in ‘poaching’ fees

July 15, 2025

Trump uses emergency appeals to reshape government with Supreme Court’s help

July 15, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

Under fire, Pam Bondi brushes aside questions about her handling of Epstein files : NPR

By adminJuly 15, 2025

US Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks about recent drug enforcement actions during a news conference…

Stacey Abrams is focused on ensuring fair elections in 2026 : NPR

July 15, 2025

Supreme Court says Education Department dismantling can continue : NPR

July 14, 2025

Trump faces MAGA backlash after saying to move on from Epstein files : NPR

July 14, 2025
Our Picks

Diamondbacks star Ketel Marte has home burglarized during All-Star break

July 17, 2025

South Korea’s top court upholds Lee’s acquittal in Samsung merger

July 17, 2025

Controversy Over Judge’s Secret Romance Heads To Trial

July 16, 2025

Lawsuit seeks to stop ICE agents from arresting migrants at immigration courts

July 16, 2025
About Us
About Us

Welcome to Justice and Equality for All, your trusted source for information on federal courts, legal systems, and issues of justice and discrimination. We are dedicated to providing insightful analysis, legal resources, and discussions on unjust legal actions, court rulings, and the scales of justice.

Our Picks

Diamondbacks star Ketel Marte has home burglarized during All-Star break

July 17, 2025

South Korea’s top court upholds Lee’s acquittal in Samsung merger

July 17, 2025

Controversy Over Judge’s Secret Romance Heads To Trial

July 16, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Registration
    • Login
© 2025 justiceandequalityforall. Designed by justiceandequalityforall.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.